![]() ![]() Under this calculation, the chance of me beating a 2200 player is 1 in 500, while the chance of me beating Magnus Carlsen would be 1 in 24000. ELO ratings can be used to estimate the chance of victory in a matchup, although the estimates are somewhat crude for very large skill differences. The top chess player Magnus Carlsen is at an incredible 2853. In comparison, a chess master is ~2200, a grandmaster is ~2700. My rating on lichess blitz is 1200, on rapid is 1600, which some calculator online said would place me at ~1100 ELO on the FIDE scale. I mainly just play online blitz and rapid games for fun. I never bothered to learn any openings in real detail, or do studies on complex endgames. I’m better than most of my friends that play, but I never reached my dad’s level of chess obsession. Now I am a fully blown adult with a PhD, I’m a lot better at chess than I was a kid. I still lost a bunch though, because I blundered pieces. The resource imbalance of the missing queen made the difference. ![]() When I played “odds of a queen” against my dad, the games were fun again, as I had a chance of victory and he could play as normal without acting intentionally dumb. ![]() “Odds of a queen”, for example, refers to taking the queen of the stronger player off the board. When two players with very different skill levels want to play each other, the stronger player will start off with some pieces missing from their side of the board. This is a common problem in chess, with a well established solution: It’s called “odds”. Not many kids have the patience to lose dozens of games in a row and never even get close to victory. In a purely skill based game like chess, an extreme skill imbalance means that the more skilled player essentially always wins, and in chess, it ends up being a slaughter that is no fun for either player. He was playing local tournaments and could play blindfolded, while I was, well, a child. The problem was that my dad was extremely good. As a kid, I really enjoyed chess, as did my dad. This is: When do "brains beat brawn" in Chess? An experiment, published by titotal on Jon The AI Alignment Forum. Welcome to The Nonlinear Library, where we use Text-to-Speech software to convert the best writing from the Rationalist and EA communities into audio. Per maggiori informazioni sulle modalità e finalità per cui Amazon utilizza i dati personali (come, ad esempio, la cronologia degli ordini dei negozi Amazon), consulta la nostra Informativa sulla privacy. Puoi modificare le tue preferenze in qualsiasi momento visitando la pagina sulle Preferenze cookie, come descritto nell'Informativa sui cookie. Clicca su "Personalizza i cookie" per non accettare questi cookie, gestire le tue preferenze ulteriori o saperne di più. I terzi utilizzano i cookie per le loro finalità di mostrare e analizzare la pubblicità personalizzata, generare informazioni sui destinatari e sviluppare e migliorare i prodotti. Questo comprende l'utilizzo di cookie di prima parte e di terze parti che memorizzano o accedono a informazioni standard del dispositivo, come l’identificatore univoco. Se accetti, utilizzeremo i cookie anche per ottimizzare la tua esperienza di acquisto nei negozi Amazon come descritto nella nostra Informativa sui cookie. Utilizziamo questi cookie anche per capire come i clienti utilizzano i nostri servizi per poterli migliorare (ad esempio, analizzando le interazioni con il sito). Utilizziamo cookie e altre tecnologie simili necessari per consentirti di effettuare acquisti, per migliorare le tue esperienze di acquisto e per fornire i nostri servizi, come descritto in dettaglio nella nostra Informativa sui cookie. Selezione delle preferenze relative ai cookie ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |